Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Pharmacoepidemiology...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Pharmacoepidemiology and Drug Safety
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Validation of Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum Mother‐Baby Link

Authors: Catherine Vasilakis‐Scaramozza; Rebecca Persson; George Kafatos; David Neasham; Katrina Wilcox Hagberg; Susan Jick;

Validation of Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum Mother‐Baby Link

Abstract

ABSTRACTPurposeAssess the validity of the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum Mother‐Baby Link (MBL).MethodsWe assessed the validity of CPRD Aurum MBL pairs using several strategies. Our study population was based on all available MBL pairs in a 100‐practice sample of CPRD Aurum. We sent a questionnaire to the general practitioner of a sample of MBL patients asking if linkage was correct and whether delivery date was correct within 14 days. We also compared MBL delivery date to the matched child's birth date in CPRD Aurum. Finally, in the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) eligible population, we compared MBL delivery date to birthing parent's HES delivery date.ResultsThe study population included 124 962 MBL pairs: 124 962 livebirths, 91 218 birthing parents, and 123 562 deliveries. Based on 361 questionnaire responses standardized to the MBL population, 85% (95% CI 74%–96%) of pairs were confirmed as correctly matched, <1% (0.04%–1.4%) were incorrectly matched, and 13% (10%–18%) could not be confirmed. For 71% (61%–82%) of the sample, delivery date was correct within 14 days. Among the entire population of 124 962 MBL pairs, 73% of MBL pairs had MBL delivery date within the baby's birth month recorded in CPRD Aurum. Among 79 834 patients with HES linkage, 94% of 107 080 MBL deliveries in CPRD Aurum were confirmed in HES.ConclusionsOur various assessments of CPRD Aurum MBL found the great majority of pairs were correctly matched and most delivery dates were correct within 14 days. Further refinement of delivery dates may be necessary for some studies.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Databases, Factual, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Female, Medical Record Linkage

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!