
doi: 10.1002/pds.5860
pmid: 39961733
ABSTRACTPurposeAssess the validity of the Clinical Practice Research Datalink (CPRD) Aurum Mother‐Baby Link (MBL).MethodsWe assessed the validity of CPRD Aurum MBL pairs using several strategies. Our study population was based on all available MBL pairs in a 100‐practice sample of CPRD Aurum. We sent a questionnaire to the general practitioner of a sample of MBL patients asking if linkage was correct and whether delivery date was correct within 14 days. We also compared MBL delivery date to the matched child's birth date in CPRD Aurum. Finally, in the Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) eligible population, we compared MBL delivery date to birthing parent's HES delivery date.ResultsThe study population included 124 962 MBL pairs: 124 962 livebirths, 91 218 birthing parents, and 123 562 deliveries. Based on 361 questionnaire responses standardized to the MBL population, 85% (95% CI 74%–96%) of pairs were confirmed as correctly matched, <1% (0.04%–1.4%) were incorrectly matched, and 13% (10%–18%) could not be confirmed. For 71% (61%–82%) of the sample, delivery date was correct within 14 days. Among the entire population of 124 962 MBL pairs, 73% of MBL pairs had MBL delivery date within the baby's birth month recorded in CPRD Aurum. Among 79 834 patients with HES linkage, 94% of 107 080 MBL deliveries in CPRD Aurum were confirmed in HES.ConclusionsOur various assessments of CPRD Aurum MBL found the great majority of pairs were correctly matched and most delivery dates were correct within 14 days. Further refinement of delivery dates may be necessary for some studies.
Adult, Male, Databases, Factual, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Female, Medical Record Linkage
Adult, Male, Databases, Factual, Pregnancy, Surveys and Questionnaires, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Female, Medical Record Linkage
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
