
doi: 10.1002/pds.3198
pmid: 22488843
ABSTRACTPurposeEmerging interests in pharmacoepidemiology make it important to define the profession's core content. The International Society for Pharmacoepidemiology (ISPE)'s Education Committee sought to develop a consensus on its core disciplines. This report recapitulates their efforts and conclusions.MethodsThe survey for skill inventories conducted characterized the field of pharmacoepidemiology by five categories of core competency/knowledge (pharmacovigilance, exposure data, epidemiology, clinical pharmacology, and medical product regulation) plus communication and leadership in these areas. It was sent to pharmacoepidemiology units within the industry, academia, and government representing the membership worldwide.ResultsAfter three waves, 125 members responded (~10% of the membership). Respondents were from North America (61%), European Union (23%), and the remainder from Asian Pacific and South American regions, representing the full spectrum of ISPE membership. Pharmacovigilance, analysis of exposure data, epidemiologic methods, and communication skills were the competencies identified as essential. Fourteen competencies were judged to be “essential” by >80% of the respondents; a further 26 had “essential” as the most frequently rated category but represented <80% of the respondents. Six items had “desirable but not a core competency” as the most commonly selected. None of the proposed competencies scored as “not a core competency” by >25% of the respondents. Only five of the competencies were suggested as “not core” by 10% or more.ConclusionsThis survey identified a wide range of content relevant to the field of pharmacoepidemiology. This list will likely evolve over time. A curriculum around these areas will help prepare the next generation of pharmacoepidemiologists. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
