
AbstractObjectiveTo compare the diagnostic performance of postmortem ultrasound (PMUS), 9.4 T magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and microfocus computed tomography (micro‐CT) for the examination of early gestation fetuses.MethodEight unselected fetuses (10–15 weeks gestational age) underwent at least 2 of the 3 listed imaging examinations. Six fetuses underwent 9.4 T MRI, four underwent micro‐CT and six underwent PMUS. All operators were blinded to clinical history. All imaging was reported according to a prespecified template assessing 36 anatomical structures, later grouped into five regions: brain, thorax, heart, abdomen and genito‐urinary.ResultsMore anatomical structures were seen on 9.4 T MRI and micro‐CT than with PMUS, with a combined frequency of identified structures of 91.9% and 69.7% versus 54.5% and 59.6 (p < 0.001; p < 0.05) respectively according to comparison groups. In comparison with 9.4 T MRI, more structures were seen on micro‐CT (90.2% vs. 83.3%, p < 0.05). Anatomical structures were described as abnormal on PMUS in 2.7%, 9.4 T MRI in 6.1% and micro‐CT 7.7% of all structures observed. However, the accuracy test could not be calculated because conventional autopsy was performed on 6 fetuses of that only one structure was abnormal.ConclusionMicro‐CT appears to offer the greatest potential as an imaging adjunct or non‐invasive alternative for conventional autopsies in early gestation fetuses.
Adult, Gestational Age, X-Ray Microtomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Fetus, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Human medicine, Postmortem Imaging
Adult, Gestational Age, X-Ray Microtomography, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Ultrasonography, Prenatal, Fetus, Pregnancy, Humans, Female, Human medicine, Postmortem Imaging
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 12 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
