
AbstractObjectivesThe congenital diaphragmatic hernia (CDH), characterized by malformation of the diaphragm and lung hypoplasia, is a common and severe birth defect that affects around 1 in 4000 live births. However, the etiology of most cases of CDH remains unclear. The aim of this study was to perform a retrospective analysis of copy number variations (CNVs) using a high‐resolution array comparative genomic hybridization (array‐CGH) in a cohort of fetuses and newborns with CDH.MethodsForty seven fetuses and newborns with either isolated or syndromic CDH were analyzed by oligonucleotide‐based array‐CGH Agilent 180K technique.ResultsA mean of 10.2 CNVs was detected by proband with a total number of 480 CNVs identified based on five categories: benign, likely benign, of uncertain signification, likely pathogenic, and pathogenic. Diagnostic performance was estimated at 19.15% (i.e., likely pathogenic and pathogenic CNVs) for both CDH types. We identified 11 potential candidate genes: COL25A1, DSEL, EYA1, FLNA, MECOM, NRXN1, RARB, SPATA13, TJP2, XIRP2, and ZFPM2.ConclusionWe suggest that COL25A1, DSEL, EYA1, FLNA, MECOM, NRXN1, RARB, SPATA13, TJP2, XIRP2, and ZFPM2 genes may be related to CDH occurrence. Thus, this study provides a possibility for new methods of a positive diagnosis.
Comparative Genomic Hybridization, Fetus, DNA Copy Number Variations, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Original Articles, Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital, Retrospective Studies, Transcription Factors
Comparative Genomic Hybridization, Fetus, DNA Copy Number Variations, Infant, Newborn, Humans, Original Articles, Hernias, Diaphragmatic, Congenital, Retrospective Studies, Transcription Factors
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 3 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
