Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Prenatal Diagnosisarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Prenatal Diagnosis
Article . 2015 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Prenatal whole‐exome sequencing: parental attitudes

Authors: Eve J, Kalynchuk; Andrew, Althouse; Lisa S, Parker; Devereux N, Saller; Aleksandar, Rajkovic;

Prenatal whole‐exome sequencing: parental attitudes

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe aim of this study was to survey the opinions of expectant parents regarding prenatal whole‐exome sequencing.MethodsThe study used a questionnaire that focused on acceptability of prenatal whole‐exome sequencing to individuals who pursued first‐trimester prenatal screening in a tertiary academic medical center. A total of 186 expectant individuals completed the questionnaire. The results of the questionnaire were analyzed using descriptive statistics and logistic regression models.ResultsEighty‐three percent of the participants answered that prenatal whole‐exome sequencing should be offered, 14.8% were neutral, and only 2.2% disagreed. Fifty‐four percent of the participants were interested in having prenatal whole‐exome sequencing for their fetus, 40.1% were neutral, and 6.6% disagreed. The majority of participants expressed a desire to know about treatable (96.2%) and non‐treatable (86.3%) childhood conditions, and most said the same for treatable (76.0%) and non‐treatable (74.3%) adult‐onset conditions. Over half of the participants (59.7%) indicated a maximum acceptable turnaround time of 3 weeks or less for prenatal whole‐exome sequencing.ConclusionsThe majority of respondents felt prenatal whole‐exome sequencing should be offered. Moreover, the majority wanted to know prenatally about treatable and non‐treatable childhood and adult conditions. © 2015 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Male, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Patient Preference, Prenatal Care, Sequence Analysis, DNA, Young Adult, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Humans, Exome, Female

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    60
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
60
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!