
doi: 10.1002/pd.4095
pmid: 23553531
ABSTRACTObjectiveThe aim of the research was to determine effectiveness of the model for prenatal control in reducing new cases of severe thalassemia.MethodsPregnant women at six tertiary centers were recruited to follow the model, consisting of (1) carrier screening using mean corpuscular volume (for alpha‐thal‐1 and beta‐thal) and CMU‐E screen (for HbE trait), (2) carrier diagnosis, (3) the couples at risk were counseled and offered prenatal diagnosis, and (4) termination of affected pregnancy. All neonates were evaluated for thalassemia.ResultsOf the 12 874 recruited pregnancies, 7008 were valid for analysis. Of them, 281 couples were identified to be at risk, Of the 281, 58 affected fetuses were identified and 55 pregnancies were terminated, whereas three did not accept pregnancy termination. All 6727 neonates at no risk were proven to be unaffected. The model had sensitivity and positive predictive value of 100% and 20%, respectively. The model could detect all of affected fetuses.ConclusionThe model could prenatally identify affected fetuses with a detection rate and negative predictive value of 100%. The model was highly effective to prenatally detect affected fetuses with an acceptable false positive rate. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Male, Genetic Carrier Screening, Infant, Newborn, Directive Counseling, Models, Biological, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Humans, Thalassemia, False Positive Reactions, Female, Abortion, Eugenic, Algorithms
Male, Genetic Carrier Screening, Infant, Newborn, Directive Counseling, Models, Biological, Severity of Illness Index, Treatment Outcome, Predictive Value of Tests, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Humans, Thalassemia, False Positive Reactions, Female, Abortion, Eugenic, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 34 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
