
ABSTRACTObjectivesTo compare three methods of cervical length measurements using ultrasound in the first trimester: single‐line, two‐line, and tracing.MethodsImages appropriate for cervical length measurements were obtained using transvaginal ultrasound between 11 + 0 and 13 + 6 weeks’ gestation. The cervix was measured on stored images using three methods: a single straight line, two segments (two‐line method), and by tracing the distance along the cervical canal. Results were compared for intraoperator repeatability and interoperator variability. The degree of the cervical curvature was measured.ResultsThe mean cervical measurement using the single‐line measurement was 32.8 (SD 4.4) mm. The mean cervical length was essentially the same using the two‐line and tracing measurement: 34.4 (SD 4.7) mm and 34.5 (SD 4.7) mm, respectively. Both intra‐ and interoperator agreement was high. The degree of curvature of the cervical canal was variable, with a resultant variability in the difference between the single straight line measurement and the other two types of measurement.ConclusionsUsing stored images, each of the measurement techniques is highly reproducible. Both the two‐line and the tracing methods yield larger measurements than the single‐line technique. Therefore, it appears that in select cases the straight line measurement significantly underestimates the actual cervical length. © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
570, 610, Reproducibility of Results, Cervix Uteri, Organ Size, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Cervical Length Measurement, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Humans, Premature Birth, Female, Prospective Studies
570, 610, Reproducibility of Results, Cervix Uteri, Organ Size, Pregnancy Trimester, First, Cervical Length Measurement, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Humans, Premature Birth, Female, Prospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 30 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
