
doi: 10.1002/pd.1836
pmid: 17880037
AbstractObjectiveTo describe the experiences in diagnostic cordocentesis in twin pregnancies at midpregnancyMethodsThe database and medical records of pregnant women attending Maternal Fetal Medicine Unit of the hospital for diagnostic cordocentesis at midpregnancy between January 1989 and September 2006 were retrospectively reviewed.ResultsDuring 17 years of experience, 4241 cordocenteses at midpregnancy were performed for prenatal diagnosis, including 59 procedures in 30 multiple pregnancies (29 twins and 1 triplet). The mean gestational age at the time of cordocentesis was 19.5 ± 1.6 weeks. Success rate of the samplings was 98.3% with one sample was maternal blood contamination. Averaged‐time used of the procedures was 8.2 minutes (range 1–45 minutes). The procedure‐related complications included transient bleeding at puncture site (8.5%) and transient fetal bradycardia (22.0%). The total fetal loss rate was 10.5% but there was no cordocentesis‐related fetal loss (0.0%), defined as a fetal loss within 2 weeks after the procedure.ConclusionThis study may provide a new insight on the safety of cordocentesis in multifetal pregnancies at midpregnancy. The procedure‐related fetal loss is not as high as reported in the past. This study suggests cordocentesis be a relatively safe and highly successful in obtaining fetal blood samples. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Adult, Fetus, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Twins, Humans, Female, Pregnancy, Multiple, Cordocentesis, Retrospective Studies
Adult, Fetus, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Twins, Humans, Female, Pregnancy, Multiple, Cordocentesis, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
