
doi: 10.1002/pd.1746
pmid: 17451190
AbstractObjectiveTo establish the utility of quantitative fluorescent polymerase chain reaction (QF‐PCR) in order to determine the zygosity of multiple pregnancies, as well as to define the origin of the most frequent aneuploidies in amniotic fluid samples.MethodsWe describe the case of a monochorionic (MC) diamniotic (DA) pregnancy with phenotypically discordant twins (nuchal cystic hygroma and non‐immune hydrops in twin A and no anomalies in twin B). QF‐PCR was performed for rapid prenatal diagnosis in uncultured amniocytes and subsequently in cultured cells. Polymorphic markers for chromosomes X, Y, 13, 18 and 21 were used for determination of zygosity as well as sex chromosome aneuploidy.ResultsTwin A showed a Turner Syndrome (TS) mosaicism pattern by QF‐PCR in uncultured amniocytes. The monozygotic origin of the pregnancy was determined. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybridization (I‐FISH) in this sample showed a mosaicism X0/XY (83/17%). Cytogenetic analysis revealed a 45,X0 karyotype in twin A and a 46,XY karyotype in twin B.ConclusionsQF‐PCR is a reliable tool for the determination of the zygosity independently of the chorionicity and the fetal sex in case of twin pregnancy. Testing both direct and cultured cells can provide useful results for genetic counselling in chromosomal mosaicisms. Copyright © 2007 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Adult, Mosaicism, Turner Syndrome, Twins, Monozygotic, Sex Determination Processes, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Pregnancy Reduction, Multifetal, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Humans, Female
Adult, Mosaicism, Turner Syndrome, Twins, Monozygotic, Sex Determination Processes, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Pregnancy Reduction, Multifetal, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Humans, Female
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
