Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Prenatal Diagnosisarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Prenatal Diagnosis
Article . 2005 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley TDM
Data sources: Crossref
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Maternal cell contamination of prenatal samples assessed by QF-PCR genotyping

Authors: Taita, Stojilkovic-Mikic; Kathy, Mann; Zoe, Docherty; Caroline, Mackie Ogilvie;

Maternal cell contamination of prenatal samples assessed by QF-PCR genotyping

Abstract

To establish the genotype of cultured cells from a cohort of amniotic fluid and chorionic villus samples, and compare this genotype with that obtained from uncultured material from the same sample, in order to assess the frequency and significance of maternal cell contamination of prenatal samples.Quantitative fluorescence-polymerase chain reaction (QF-PCR) was carried out by amplification of microsatellite markers using fluorescence-labelled primers, followed by quantitative analysis of the allele peaks on a genetic analyser. A multiplex of 12 primer pairs for four loci on each of chromosomes 13, 18 and 21 was used.A total of 307 prenatal samples were tested. Of the 254 amniotic fluid samples, 39.8% had some degree of bloodstaining, ranging from 5% bloodstaining in the cell pellet to heavily bloodstained fluid. Uncultured samples were tested by QF-PCR analysis and the cultured cells were tested by both QF-PCR and karyotype analysis. Of the samples, 90.2% had the same single genotype on direct and cultured material. Two samples (0.65%) were mosaic for an aneuploidy cell line. A second genotype, interpreted as maternal cell contamination, was identified in direct and/or cultured preparations in 9.1% of samples, 17.8% of which were not bloodstained. Seven amniotic fluid samples (2.8%) showed maternal cell contamination in cultured material.For heavily bloodstained amniotic fluid samples, a maternal blood specimen may help interpret the results of rapid trisomy testing, followed by confirmation of the fetal origin of cultured cells. QF-PCR analysis has established a higher incidence of maternal cell contamination of cultured amniocytes than previous reports; the presence of MCC (maternal cell contamination) in cultured cells from samples with no bloodstaining underlines the need for karyotype analysis of more than one XX culture.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Genotype, Mosaicism, Gestational Age, DNA, Amniotic Fluid, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Fluorescence, Specimen Handling, Chorionic Villi Sampling, Pregnancy, Prenatal Diagnosis, Amniocentesis, Humans, Female, Prospective Studies, False Negative Reactions, Maternal-Fetal Exchange, Cells, Cultured

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    59
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Top 10%
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
59
Top 10%
Top 10%
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!