
doi: 10.1002/pc.10324
AbstractThe modeling of the electrical conductivity of polymer composites reinforced with conductive fibers is investigated. Existing models generally can be divided into percolation theories and non‐percolation theories. The basis of the percolation theory is the fact that the conductivity of the composite increases dramatically at a certain fiber concentration called the percolation threshold. This theory can be used to model the behavior of the composite or to predict the percolation threshold itself. Non‐percolation theories include terms, which account for microstructural data such as fiber orientation, length, and packing arrangement. A comparison of experimental data with predictions from the various models reveals that only the percolation theory is able to accurately model the conductive behavior of an actual composite. Two alternative new models, which predict the volume resistivity of a composite using microstructural data, are evaluated. The first model relates resistivity to the concentration and orientation of the fibers, while assuming perfect fiber‐fiber contact. The relationship between resistivity and fiber concentration predicted by the model is in qualitative agreement with actual data, and predictions of the anisotropy in volume resistivity compare well with experimental results. The second model accounts for the effect of fiber‐fiber contact and fiber length on composite resistivity. Predictions are in excellent agreement with experimental data for polypropylene composites reinforced with nickel‐coated graphite fibers.
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 340 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
