
doi: 10.1002/pbc.21687
pmid: 18661485
AbstractBackgroundInvestigating transmission of a constitutive, g78238C > T (R552X), RB1 mutation in four affected children descended from three different unaffected fathers and an unaffected mother.ProceduresSequence data analyses and allele‐specific PCR assays were used to investigate the presence of the mutation in four affected children, five unaffected sibs (or half‐sibs), and the unaffected mother. Haplotyping was carried out for confirming that the children descended from different fathers.ResultsHaplotyping excluded the possibility of paternal transmission of a de novo mutation and provided evidence of maternal germline mosaicism. The mutation was apparently absent in blood‐ and buccal cell‐DNA of the mother who also showed a normal fundoscopy.ConclusionsOur findings indicated that mosaicism was restricted to the maternal germline. The mutational event must have occurred at least 4 weeks post‐conception, unlike the early mutational events of most mosaics, occurring between fertilization and the 8th day of conception. The implications of these findings are discussed in view that genetic counselling should discriminate between germline mosaicism and de novo events in pseudo‐low‐penetrant hereditary retinoblastoma. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2008;51:598–602. © 2008 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Male, Mosaicism, Retinal Neoplasms, DNA Mutational Analysis, Retinoblastoma, Genetic Counseling, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Retinoblastoma Protein, Pedigree, Haplotypes, Humans, Female, Genes, Retinoblastoma, Child, Germ-Line Mutation
Male, Mosaicism, Retinal Neoplasms, DNA Mutational Analysis, Retinoblastoma, Genetic Counseling, Polymerase Chain Reaction, Retinoblastoma Protein, Pedigree, Haplotypes, Humans, Female, Genes, Retinoblastoma, Child, Germ-Line Mutation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 16 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
