
doi: 10.1002/pbc.21037
pmid: 16937362
AbstractBackgroundPancreatitis is a well‐known, but little‐understood complication of asparaginase. There is no predictor of who will develop asparaginase‐associated pancreatitis (AAP). To better define this population, we present a retrospective analysis regarding AAP and provide a review of the relevant literature.MethodsWe systematically reviewed medical records of 254 asparaginase recipients during a 5‐year period. Pancreatitis was defined and graded according to CTCAE v3.0.ResultsPancreatitis was diagnosed in 48 (19%) patients. Thirty‐three (13%) patients were identified as having AAP. Twelve cases occurred after Escherichia coli asparaginase and 20 followed PEG‐asparaginase. Pancreatitis was independent of the individual or cumulative asparaginase dose. The interval to pancreatitis diagnosis was longer for PEG‐asparaginase than E. coli asparaginase (P = 0.02). AAP was seen more frequently in patients receiving prednisone (P = 0.02) and daunomycin (P = 0.006) while less frequent with dexamethasone (P = 0.04). Other chemotherapy agents appeared to have no association with AAP. As observed by others, those with pancreatitis were older (P = 0.001), but the significance of this remains uncertain.ConclusionsThis study emphasizes our inability to predict who will develop pancreatic toxicity from asparaginase and suggests that those at risk might have an unidentified genetic predisposition. Pediatr Blood Cancer 2007;49:634–639. © 2006 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Male, Incidence, Daunorubicin, Infant, Antineoplastic Agents, Dexamethasone, Polyethylene Glycols, Pancreatitis, Predictive Value of Tests, Child, Preschool, Asparaginase, Drug Evaluation, Humans, Prednisone, Female, Child, Retrospective Studies
Male, Incidence, Daunorubicin, Infant, Antineoplastic Agents, Dexamethasone, Polyethylene Glycols, Pancreatitis, Predictive Value of Tests, Child, Preschool, Asparaginase, Drug Evaluation, Humans, Prednisone, Female, Child, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 87 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
