
doi: 10.1002/pan3.70032
Abstract Ecologists recognise that we live on an increasingly human‐dominated planet, yet most of the field's foundational concepts remain essentially biophysical, with little reference to human society. There are few better examples of this divide between ecological and social theory than the niche concept. During its century‐long history, the niche concept has been defined in many ways, including to describe the ecological roles of humans. To date, however, it has not incorporated human influences into its various descriptions of other species' ecological roles. In this essay, we present the socio‐ecological niche (SEN) concept, which builds on the literature in niche theory by contributing insights from the social sciences and humanities to better understand the roles of non‐human species in modern socio‐ecological systems. We argue that the SEN enriches the niche concept and offers a point of connection between ecology and justice. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
canids, interdisciplinarity, GF1-900, Ecology, Human ecology. Anthropogeography, niche ecology, social‐ecological systems, sociological imagination, justice, QH540-549.5
canids, interdisciplinarity, GF1-900, Ecology, Human ecology. Anthropogeography, niche ecology, social‐ecological systems, sociological imagination, justice, QH540-549.5
| citations The total number of citations received by all articles of the researcher of interest. | 1 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
