
doi: 10.1002/pan3.10096
handle: 10023/23309
Abstract Bed bugs have re‐established themselves as a common household pest in the United States and pose significant public health and economic concerns, particularly in urban areas. Documenting the scale of the bed bug resurgence and identifying the underlying predictors of the spatial patterns of their incidence is challenging, largely because available data come from biased self‐reporting through local government code enforcement. Here, we make use of a novel source of systematically collected data from periodic inspections of multifamily housing units in Chicago to investigate neighbourhood drivers of bed bug infestation prevalence in Chicago. Bed bug infestations are strongly associated with income, eviction rates and crowding at the neighbourhood level. That bed bug prevalence is higher in lower‐income neighbourhoods with higher levels of household crowding and eviction notices provides unique empirical evidence of the disproportionate allocation of public health burdens upon neighbourhoods facing multiple dimensions of disadvantage. A free Plain Language Summary can be found within the Supporting Information of this article.
330, bed bugs, GF Human ecology. Anthropogeography, Bed bugs, socioeconomic, Socioeconomic, GF1-900, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being, RA0421, RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine, Spatial ecology, QH540-549.5, Public health, Ecology, public health, spatial ecology, metapopulation, DAS, GF, SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities, Human ecology. Anthropogeography, Metapopulation
330, bed bugs, GF Human ecology. Anthropogeography, Bed bugs, socioeconomic, Socioeconomic, GF1-900, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being, RA0421, RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine, Spatial ecology, QH540-549.5, Public health, Ecology, public health, spatial ecology, metapopulation, DAS, GF, SDG 11 - Sustainable Cities and Communities, Human ecology. Anthropogeography, Metapopulation
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
