
AbstractObjectiveWe evaluated an ototoxicity monitoring program (OMP) for improving audiologic follow‐up in head and neck cancer (HNC) patients.Study DesignRetrospective cohort study.SettingTertiary academic center.MethodsTwo hundred and forty patients were recommended for chemotherapy between January 2017 and June 2022. An OMP was implemented in March 2021; every patient received an audiology referral and was contacted to schedule a pretreatment audiogram. Patients were divided into pre‐OMP and post‐OMP cohorts. Main outcome measures included rates of pretreatment audiograms, posttreatment audiograms, posttreatment otologic symptoms, and hearing aid utilization.ResultsThere were 131 patients evaluated pre‐OMP and 109 evaluated post‐OMP. The mean age for all patients was 62.8 ± 11.9 years; 76.3% were male. After the implementation of the OMP, a significantly higher proportion of patients received a pretreatment audiogram (66.1% vs 34.4%, P < .001), with enrolled patients being 3.8 times more likely to obtain 1 (95% confidence interval: 2.2‐6.6), P < .001). There was a significant increase in reported otologic symptoms after implementing the program (18% vs 36%, P = .002). However, the rate of hearing aid utilization decreased after OMP implementation (pre‐OMP: 33% vs post‐OMP: 13%, P = .02).ConclusionImplementation of an OMP significantly improved the proportion of HNC patients that underwent pretreatment audiograms prior to systemic therapy; however, audiologic follow‐up remained largely unchanged in the posttreatment period.Level of EvidenceLevel 4.
Otorhinolaryngology, RF1-547, RD1-811, cisplatin, head and neck cancer, ototoxicity monitoring, Surgery, Original Research
Otorhinolaryngology, RF1-547, RD1-811, cisplatin, head and neck cancer, ototoxicity monitoring, Surgery, Original Research
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
