
AbstractObjectiveLipid‐laden macrophage index (LLMI) has been proposed as a marker for aspiration on bronchoalveolar lavage. It has also been studied as a marker for gastroesophageal reflux and other pulmonary diseases. This review aims to determine the clinical correlation between LLMI and pediatric aspiration.Data SourcesPubMed (MeSH search), Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) portals through December 17th, 2020.Review MethodsPreferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta‐Analysis criteria were followed, and a quality assessment of included studies was performed using the Methodological Index for Non‐Randomized Studies. Search criteria included all occurrences in the title or abstract of the terms “pulmonary aspiration” and “alveolar macrophages.”ResultsFive studies describing 720 patients met inclusion, 3 retrospective case‐control studies, and 2 prospective observational studies. Four studies suggested a link between elevated LLMI and aspiration, and 1 found no association. Control groups varied and included healthy nonaspirators to nonaspirators with other pulmonary diseases. Diagnosis of aspiration was not standardized across the studies. Three papers proposed cutoff values for LLMI, all different.ConclusionThe existing literature indicates that LLMI is not a sensitive or specific marker for aspiration. Further study is needed to define the utility of LLMI in pediatric aspiration.
Systematic Review with or without Meta‐Analysis, aspiration, Otorhinolaryngology, RF1-547, RD1-811, bronchoalveolar lavage, Surgery, lipid‐laden macrophages
Systematic Review with or without Meta‐Analysis, aspiration, Otorhinolaryngology, RF1-547, RD1-811, bronchoalveolar lavage, Surgery, lipid‐laden macrophages
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 15 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
