
AbstractThe five B‐subunits (CTB5) of the Vibrio cholerae (cholera) toxin can bind to the intestinal cell surface so the entire AB5 toxin can enter the cell. Simultaneous binding can occur on more than one of the monosialotetrahexosylganglioside (GM1) units present on the cell surface. Such simultaneous binding arising from the toxins multivalency is believed to enhance its affinity. Thus, blocking the initial attachment of the toxin to the cell surface using inhibitors with GM1 subunits has the potential to stop the disease. Previously we showed that tetravalent GM1 molecules were sub‐nanomolar inhibitors of CTB5. In this study, we synthesized a pentavalent version and compared the binding and potency of penta‐ and tetravalent cholera toxin inhibitors, based on the same scaffold, for the first time. The pentavalent geometry did not yield major benefits over the tetravalent species, but it was still a strong inhibitor, and no major steric clashes occurred when binding the toxin. Thus, systems which can adopt more geometries, such as those described here, can be equally potent, and this may possibly be due to their ability to form higher‐order structures or simply due to more statistical options for binding.
cholera toxin, Cholera toxin, CuAAC click conjugation, glycodendrimers, General Chemistry, multivalency, Full Papers, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being, GM1 oligosaccharide, Glycodendrimers, Multivalency
cholera toxin, Cholera toxin, CuAAC click conjugation, glycodendrimers, General Chemistry, multivalency, Full Papers, SDG 3 - Good Health and Well-being, GM1 oligosaccharide, Glycodendrimers, Multivalency
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 14 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
