Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Otolaryngologyarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Otolaryngology
Article . 2025 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
Otolaryngology
Article . 2025
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Cochlear Implantation After Traumatic Brain Injury

Authors: Russell W. De Jong; Amanda Y. Dao; James K. Aden; John P. Marinelli; Isaac D. Erbele;

Cochlear Implantation After Traumatic Brain Injury

Abstract

AbstractObjectiveThe objective of this study is to determine if a history of traumatic brain injury (TBI) degrades postoperative the audiological performance of patients with cochlear implantation (CI).Study DesignRetrospective review.SettingDepartment of Defense‐wide database.MethodsInternational Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD‐9) and ICD‐10 codes were used to identify patients that were diagnosed with TBI prior to CI between 2005 and 2023. They were matched 2:1 with controls without TBI based on age and sex. Preoperative and postoperative pure tone average (PTA) thresholds and AzBio scores were compared.ResultsNineteen TBI patients representing 20 implanted ears were identified and matched with 39 patients without TBI representing 40 implanted ears. Thirteen ears carried a diagnosis of mild TBI, and seven were diagnosed with moderate to severe TBI. The average follow‐up period was 44 months. The TBI group attained mean postoperative PTA and AzBio scores of 37 dB (SD 24) and 67% (SD 28). The non‐TBI group attained scores of 31 dB (SD 12) and 69% (SD 26). P‐values for the PTA and AzBio intergroup comparisons were .93 and .88, respectively. All TBI ears attained at least sound awareness after implantation, with 79% achieving open‐set speech perception compared to 82% of non‐TBI ears.ConclusionCI after TBI of any severity provides hearing rehabilitation comparable to patients without a prior diagnosis of TBI.

Keywords

Male, Adult, Young Adult, Adolescent, Brain Injuries, Traumatic, Humans, Audiometry, Pure-Tone, Female, Middle Aged, Hearing Loss, Cochlear Implantation, Retrospective Studies, Aged

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    1
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
1
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!