
doi: 10.1002/nur.20003
pmid: 14745856
AbstractThe purpose of this study was to conduct additional psychometric testing on an instrument designed to measure psychological adaptation in end‐of‐life populations across a wide spectrum of terminal illnesses. A sample of 20 participants completed initial testing of the Life Closure Scale (LCS); however, its usefulness was limited by the small sample size. A larger sample of 113 home hospice individuals who met established criteria and who gave informed consent completed the 27‐item LCS for additional psychometric testing. Cronbach's alphas and correlation coefficients were computed, and factor analysis was conducted to establish internal consistency reliability, theoretical clarity, and criterion‐related validity. The number of scale items was reduced to 20, with a total alpha of .87. Cronbach's alphas for the two subscales were .80 (self‐reconciled) and .82 (self‐restructuring). Item–total correlations for the subscales ranged from a low of .37 to a high of .68, with confirmatory factor analysis yielding two loadings. These findings lend credence to the usefulness of the LCS in measuring psychological adaptation in dying persons. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Res Nurs Health 27:52–62, 2004
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Psychological Tests, Attitude to Death, Psychometrics, Hospices, Personal Satisfaction, Middle Aged, Home Care Services, Adaptation, Psychological, Quality of Life, Humans, Terminally Ill, Female, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Psychological Tests, Attitude to Death, Psychometrics, Hospices, Personal Satisfaction, Middle Aged, Home Care Services, Adaptation, Psychological, Quality of Life, Humans, Terminally Ill, Female, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
