
doi: 10.1002/num.20017
AbstractDifference schemes for linear hyperbolic systems are considered. As a main result, a weak derivative form (WDF) of the governing equations is derived, which is also valid near flow discontinuities. The occurrence of one‐sided derivatives in the WDF structure indicated how to difference near discontinuities. When first‐order differencing is applied to the WDF result, the (linearly identical) schemes by Godunov, Roe, and Steger‐Warming are reproduced. The extension to nonlinear systems is via a local linearization. Choosing Roe's averaging reduces the WDF algorithm to Roe's scheme, whereas other nonlinear WDF schemes are possible. The suitability of various kinds of averaging is numerically investigated. For weak shocks a surprising lack of sensitivity of the method to a particular averaging is exhibited. However, for strong shocks and where the ordinary arithmetic average is used, a slightly more pronounced difference in performance exists between Roe's scheme and WDF. © 2004 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. Numer Methods Partial Differential Eq, 2004
shock capturing, Steger-Warming method, Shocks and singularities for hyperbolic equations, Godunov method, linear hyperbolic systems, Hyperbolic conservation laws, Finite difference methods for initial value and initial-boundary value problems involving PDEs, Roes's method, weak derivative algorithm, shocks, Initial value problems for first-order hyperbolic systems, conservation laws, nonlinear systems
shock capturing, Steger-Warming method, Shocks and singularities for hyperbolic equations, Godunov method, linear hyperbolic systems, Hyperbolic conservation laws, Finite difference methods for initial value and initial-boundary value problems involving PDEs, Roes's method, weak derivative algorithm, shocks, Initial value problems for first-order hyperbolic systems, conservation laws, nonlinear systems
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 0 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
