
doi: 10.1002/nme.979
AbstractAtkins and Tabor's approach (J. Mech. Phys. Solids 1965; 13: 149) for predicting uniaxial stress–strain relation of metals from cone indentation tests has been studied using numerical (finite element) simulation of cone indentation. Two indentation parameters, namely representative strain and constraint factor, which are central to the prediction approach, have been estimated using the simulation for cone indenters of different apical angles. The effect of specimen–indenter interface friction on these parameters has been characterized. It is shown that uncertainty in our knowledge of this friction condition has an important bearing on the prediction of the stress–strain curve. However, a good estimate of the stress–strain curve can be obtained by making reasonable assumptions about the nature of the friction at the specimen–indenter interface. The simulation results are found to agree well with those reported in the experimental study of Atkins and Tabor, when a coefficient of friction value typical for the specimen–indenter interface is used. Copyright © 2004 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Cone indentation, Friction in solid mechanics, Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics, stress-strain relation, finite element simulation, friction, Contact in solid mechanics
Cone indentation, Friction in solid mechanics, Finite element methods applied to problems in solid mechanics, stress-strain relation, finite element simulation, friction, Contact in solid mechanics
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
