
SummaryOne of the main difficulties that a reduced‐order method could face is the poor separability of the solution. This problem is common to both a posteriori model order reduction (proper orthogonal decomposition, reduced basis) and a priori [proper generalized decomposition (PGD)] model order reduction. Early approaches to solve it include the construction of local reduced‐order models in the framework of POD. We present here an extension of local models in a PGD—and thus, a priori—context. Three different strategies are introduced to estimate the size of the different patches or regions in the solution manifold where PGD is applied. As will be noticed, no gluing or special technique is needed to deal with the resulting set of local reduced‐order models, in contrast to most proper orthogonal decomposition local approximations.The resulting method can be seen as a sort of a priori manifold learning or nonlinear dimensionality reduction technique. Examples are shown that demonstrate pros and cons of each strategy for different problems.
[SPI.MECA.STRU]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Mechanics [physics.med-ph]/Structural mechanics [physics.class-ph], Numerical methods for partial differential equations, boundary value problems, nonlinear dimensionality reduction, kernel principal component analysis, local model order reduction, proper generalized decomposition, 510
[SPI.MECA.STRU]Engineering Sciences [physics]/Mechanics [physics.med-ph]/Structural mechanics [physics.class-ph], Numerical methods for partial differential equations, boundary value problems, nonlinear dimensionality reduction, kernel principal component analysis, local model order reduction, proper generalized decomposition, 510
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 21 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
