
Microscopic magnetic field inhomogeneities caused by iron deposition or tissue‐air interfaces may result in rapid decay of transverse magnetization in MRI. The aim of this study is to detect and quantify the distribution of iron‐based nanoparticles in mouse models by applying ultrashort‐echo‐time (UTE) sequences in tissues exhibiting extremely fast transverse relaxation. In 24 C57BL/6 mice (two controls), suspensions containing either non‐oxidic Fe or AuFeOx nanoparticles were injected into the tail vein at two doses (200 μg and 600 μg per mouse). Mice underwent MRI using a UTE sequence at 4.7 T field strength with five different echo times between 100 μs and 5000 μs. Transverse relaxation times T2* were computed for the lung, liver, and spleen by mono‐exponential fitting. In UTE imaging, the MRI signal could reliably be detected even in liver parenchyma exhibiting the highest deposition of nanoparticles. In animals treated with Fe nanoparticles (600 μg per mouse), the relaxation time substantially decreased in the liver (3418 ± 1534 μs (control) versus 228 ± 67 μs), the spleen (2170 ± 728 μs versus 299 ± 97 μs), and the lungs (663 ± 101 μs versus 413 ± 99 μs). The change in transverse relaxation was dependent on the number and composition of the nanoparticles. By pixel‐wise curve fitting, T2* maps were calculated showing nanoparticle distribution. In conclusion, UTE sequences may be used to assess and quantify nanoparticle distribution in tissues exhibiting ultrafast signal decay in MRI.
Iron, nanoparticle, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, ultrashort-echo-time, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Disease Models, Animal, Mice, Animals, Nanoparticles, iron quantification, UTE, iron quantification; nanoparticle; ultrashort-echo-time; UTE, Research Articles
Iron, nanoparticle, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, ultrashort-echo-time, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Disease Models, Animal, Mice, Animals, Nanoparticles, iron quantification, UTE, iron quantification; nanoparticle; ultrashort-echo-time; UTE, Research Articles
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
