
The purpose of this study is 1) to demonstrate reproducibility of spin echo‐echo planar imaging (SE‐EPI) magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) to estimate kidney stiffness; and 2) to compare SE‐EPI MRE and gradient recalled echo (GRE) MRE‐derived stiffness estimations in various anatomical regions of the kidney.Kidney MRE was performed on 33 healthy subjects (8 for SE‐EPI MRE reproducibility and 25 for comparison with GRE MRE; age range: 22–66 years) in a 3 T MRI scanner. To demonstrate SE‐EPI MRE reproducibility, subjects were scanned for the first scan and then asked to leave the scan room and repositioned again for the second (repeat) scan. Similar set‐up was used for GRE MRE as well. The displacement data was then processed to obtain overall stiffness estimates of the kidney. Concordance correlation analyses were performed to determine SE‐EPI MRE reproducibility and agreement between GRE MRE and SE‐EPI MRE derived stiffness.A high concordance correlation (ρc = 0.95; p‐value<0.0001) was obtained for SE‐EPI MRE reproducibility. Good concordance correlation was observed (ρc = 0.84; p < 0.0001 for both kidneys, ρc = 0.91; p < 0.0001 for right kidney and ρc = 0.78; p < 0.0001 for left kidney) between GRE MRE and SE‐EPI MRE derived stiffness measurements. Paired t‐test results showed that stiffness value of medulla was significantly (p < 0.0001) greater than cortex using SE‐EPI MRE as well as GRE MRE.SE‐EPI MRE was reproducible and good agreement was observed in MRE‐derived stiffness measurements obtained using SE‐EPI and GRE sequences. Therefore, SE‐EPI can be used for kidney MRE applications.
Adult, Young Adult, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Echo-Planar Imaging, Elasticity Imaging Techniques, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Spin Labels, Middle Aged, Kidney, Aged
Adult, Young Adult, Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy, Echo-Planar Imaging, Elasticity Imaging Techniques, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Spin Labels, Middle Aged, Kidney, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 20 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
