Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Nonprofit Business A...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Nonprofit Business Advisor
Article . 2018 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
Claim

Early 2017 data show solid gains in donations

descriptionPublicationkeyboard_double_arrow_right Article 25 Mar 2018 English Publisher:WileyJournal:Nonprofit Business Advisor, volume 2,018, pages 6-8 (issn: 1531-5428, eissn: 1949-3193, Copyright policy )

doi: 10.1002/nba.30437

Early 2017 data show solid gains in donations

Abstract

According to an early look at charitable giving data for 2017, total giving in the United States grew by about 4.1 percent, thanks to a strong stock market, spikes in giving in response to political issues, a continued shift to digital giving and a strong finish in the final few months of the year. Those findings, detailed in the 2017 Charitable Giving Report, recently released by nonprofit software firm Blackbaud, are based on overall giving data from 8,453 organizations representing $29.7 billion in total fundraising from 2017. The report also includes online giving data from 5,709 organizations representing $3.1 billion in online fundraising from 2017.

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 0
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    		 Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    		 Average
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
0
Average
Average
Average
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!
uploadUpload now