
doi: 10.1002/nau.20924
pmid: 20882675
AbstractAimsThe Nocturnal Bladder Capacity Index (NBCi) has been reported to be useful in distinguishing between nocturia caused by low bladder capacity and nocturnal polyuria. This paper aims to calculate reference values for NBCi from an asymptomatic population by comparing these with NBCi values from patients with lower urinary tract symptoms (LUTS) to obtain an indication of the sensitivity with which the NBCi detects low nocturnal bladder capacity. This paper also compares the sensitivity of rounded and unrounded calculations of NBCi.MethodsComputer processed 3‐day bladder diaries from 253 asymptomatic volunteers and 184 female patients with LUTS were analyzed. NBCi values were calculated from each diary using rounded and unrounded formulae. 90th and 95th centile NBCi cutoff values were obtained from frequency distributions.ResultsNBCi reference values from the asymptomatic group were 1.1 (unrounded) and 0.7 (rounded) for 90th centile, and 1.3 (unrounded) and 1.0 (rounded) for 95th centile. The use of the rounded formula gave identical NBCi values despite a large variation in Vn/Vmax ratios whereas unrounded NBCis varied continuously with Vn/Vmax ratios. The unrounded formula found significantly more elevated NBCis in the patient group.ConclusionWe suggest that an unrounded NBCi of 1.3 be considered a cutoff point above which reduced nocturnal bladder capacity should be investigated as a cause of nocturia. Rounding the NBCi lead to an underestimation of elevated values in a population of female patients with LUTS. Neurourol. Urodynam. 30:52–57, 2011. © 2010 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Polyuria, Urinary Bladder, Urination, Middle Aged, Diagnosis, Differential, Young Adult, Reference Values, Humans, Female, Nocturia, Aged
Adult, Aged, 80 and over, Male, Adolescent, Polyuria, Urinary Bladder, Urination, Middle Aged, Diagnosis, Differential, Young Adult, Reference Values, Humans, Female, Nocturia, Aged
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 103 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
