
AbstractIntestinal transplantation has evolved from being considered an experimental procedure into a clinically accepted therapy for patients with intestinal failure and parenteral nutrition life‐threatening complications. Early referral, advances in immunosuppression therapy, standardization of surgical techniques, prophylactic therapy of infections, early diagnosis of rejection, and better posttransplant patient management are some of the changes that have allowed more patients to receive transplants, thus recovering intestinal sufficiency, and at the same time allowing the procedure to spread worldwide. Over the last 2 decades, transplant centers have focused on improving short‐term patient survival, which has consequently increased by >20%. It is now clear that even though isolated intestinal‐transplant recipients have lower mortality risk on the waiting list, they are at higher risk for long‐term graft loss. Mortality is higher on the waiting list and early posttransplant in recipients whose intestinal transplants are associated with liver grafts; however, they have better long‐term patient and graft survival. Nevertheless, 3‐year actuarial patient survival has not changed over the same period of time, and therefore this is our challenge for the next decade. Mt Sinai J Med 79:246–255, 2012. © 2012 Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Graft Rejection, Immunosuppression Therapy, OUTCOMES, Parenteral Nutrition, Waiting Lists, TRANSPLANTATION, Graft Survival, Nutritional Status, WAITING LIST, SURVIVAL REFERRAL, Intestines, Intestinal Diseases, Treatment Outcome, QUALITY OF LIFE, REJECTION, INTESTINE, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2, Quality of Life, Humans, NUTRITION, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3
Graft Rejection, Immunosuppression Therapy, OUTCOMES, Parenteral Nutrition, Waiting Lists, TRANSPLANTATION, Graft Survival, Nutritional Status, WAITING LIST, SURVIVAL REFERRAL, Intestines, Intestinal Diseases, Treatment Outcome, QUALITY OF LIFE, REJECTION, INTESTINE, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3.2, Quality of Life, Humans, NUTRITION, https://purl.org/becyt/ford/3
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 8 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
