
doi: 10.1002/msj.20243
pmid: 21425272
AbstractThe use of bed rest in medicine dates back to Hippocrates, who first recommended bed rest as a restorative measure for pain. With the formalization of prenatal care in the early 1900s, maternal bed rest became a standard of care, especially toward the end of pregnancy. Antepartum bed rest is a common obstetric management tool, with up to 95% of obstetricians utilizing maternal activity restriction in some way in their practice. Bed rest is prescribed for a variety of complications of pregnancy, from threatened abortion and multiple gestations to preeclampsia and preterm labor. Although the use of bed rest is pervasive, there is a paucity of data to support its use. Additionally, many well‐documented adverse physical, psychological, familial, societal, and financial effects have been discussed in the literature. There have been no complications of pregnancy for which the literature consistently demonstrates a benefit to antepartum bed rest. Given the well‐documented adverse effects of bed rest, disruption of social relationships, and financial implications of this intervention, there is a real need for scientific investigation to establish whether this is an appropriate therapeutic modality. Well‐designed randomized, controlled trials of bed rest versus normal activity for various complications of pregnancy are required to lay this debate to rest once and for all. Mt Sinai J Med 78:291–302, 2011. © 2011 Mount Sinai School of Medicine
Prenatal Care, Standard of Care, Abortion, Threatened, Obstetric Labor, Premature, Pre-Eclampsia, Social Isolation, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Humans, Female, Pregnancy, Multiple, Bed Rest, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Prenatal Care, Standard of Care, Abortion, Threatened, Obstetric Labor, Premature, Pre-Eclampsia, Social Isolation, Pregnancy, Risk Factors, Humans, Female, Pregnancy, Multiple, Bed Rest, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 34 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
