
AbstractPurposeTo employ optimal control for the numerical design of Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) saturation pulses to maximize contrast and stability against inhomogeneities.Theory and MethodsWe applied an optimal control framework for the design pulse shapes for CEST saturation pulse trains. The cost functional minimized both the pulse energy and the discrepancy between the corresponding CEST spectrum and the target spectrum based on a continuous radiofrequency (RF) pulse. The optimization is subject to hardware limitations. In measurements on a 7 T preclinical scanner, the optimal control pulses were compared to continuous‐wave and Gaussian saturation methods. We conducted a comparison of the optimal control pulses with Gaussian, block pulse trains, and adiabatic spin‐lock pulses.ResultsThe optimal control pulse train demonstrated saturation levels comparable to continuous‐wave saturation and surpassed Gaussian saturation by up to 50 % in phantom measurements. In phantom measurements at 3 T the optimized pulses not only showcased the highest CEST contrast, but also the highest stability against field inhomogeneities. In contrast, block pulse saturation resulted in severe artifacts. Dynamic Bloch‐McConnell simulations were employed to identify the source of these artifacts, and underscore the robustness of the optimized pulses.ConclusionIn this work, it was shown that a substantial improvement in pulsed saturation CEST imaging can be achieved by using Optimal Control design principles. It is possible to overcome the sensitivity of saturation to B0 inhomogeneities while achieving CEST contrast close to continuous wave saturation.
Phantoms, Imaging, Radio Waves, Normal Distribution, 610, Contrast Media, FOS: Physical sciences, Physics - Medical Physics, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Biological Physics (physics.bio-ph), Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Computer Simulation, Physics - Biological Physics, Medical Physics (physics.med-ph), Artifacts, Algorithms
Phantoms, Imaging, Radio Waves, Normal Distribution, 610, Contrast Media, FOS: Physical sciences, Physics - Medical Physics, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Biological Physics (physics.bio-ph), Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Computer Simulation, Physics - Biological Physics, Medical Physics (physics.med-ph), Artifacts, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
