Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/ Magnetic Resonance i...arrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos Open Access logo, converted into svg, designed by PLoS. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white.svg art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina, Beao, JakobVoss, and AnonMoos http://www.plos.org/
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Article . 2020 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
https://dx.doi.org/10.48550/ar...
Article . 2018
License: arXiv Non-Exclusive Distribution
Data sources: Datacite
versions View all 5 versions
addClaim

SURE‐based automatic parameter selection for ESPIRiT calibration

Authors: Siddharth Iyer; Frank Ong; Kawin Setsompop; Mariya Doneva; Michael Lustig;

SURE‐based automatic parameter selection for ESPIRiT calibration

Abstract

PurposeESPIRiT is a parallel imaging method that estimates coil sensitivity maps from the auto‐calibration region (ACS). This requires choosing several parameters for the optimal map estimation. While fairly robust to these parameter choices, occasionally, poor selection can result in reduced performance. The purpose of this work is to automatically select parameters in ESPIRiT for more robust and consistent performance across a variety of exams.MethodsBy viewing ESPIRiT as a denoiser, Stein’s unbiased risk estimate (SURE) is leveraged to automatically optimize parameter selection in a data‐driven manner. The optimum parameters corresponding to the minimum true squared error, minimum SURE as derived from densely sampled, high‐resolution, and non‐accelerated data and minimum SURE as derived from ACS are compared using simulation experiments. To avoid optimizing the rank of ESPIRiT’s auto‐calibrating matrix (one of the parameters), a heuristic derived from SURE‐based singular value thresholding is also proposed.ResultsSimulations show SURE derived from the densely sampled, high‐resolution, and non‐accelerated data to be an accurate estimator of the true mean squared error, enabling automatic parameter selection. The parameters that minimize SURE as derived from ACS correspond well to the optimal parameters. The soft‐threshold heuristic improves computational efficiency while providing similar results to an exhaustive search. In‐vivo experiments verify the reliability of this method.ConclusionsUsing SURE to determine ESPIRiT parameters allows for automatic parameter selections. In‐vivo results are consistent with simulation and theoretical results.

Keywords

Calibration, Reproducibility of Results, FOS: Physical sciences, Computer Simulation, Medical Physics (physics.med-ph), Physics - Medical Physics, Algorithms, Probability

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    12
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
12
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Green
bronze