
PurposePhase artifacts due to B0 inhomogeneity can severely degrade the quality of MR images. The artifacts are particularly prominent in long‐TE scans and usually appear as ghosting and blur. We propose a retrospective phase correction method based on autofocusing. The proposed method uses raw data acquired with standard imaging sequences, and does not rely on navigators or external measures of field inhomogeneity.MethodsWe formulate and solve the optimization problem, where we seek the latent phase offsets that are associated with an optimal value of the image quality measure that is evaluated in the spatial domain. As a quality measure we use entropy computed on spatial image gradients. We propose two types of objective function, both compatible with parallel imaging and accelerated image acquisition.ResultsWe evaluate the method on both synthetic and real data. In real data case we evaluate the performance on a range of sequences and images acquired with different acceleration factors. The experimental results demonstrate that our method is capable of minimizing ghosting artifacts and that the quality of the output images is similar to navigator‐based reconstructions.ConclusionThe presented technique can be alternative to or complement navigator‐based methods, and is able to improve images with severe phase artifacts from all standard imaging sequences. Magn Reson Med 80:958–968, 2018. © 2018 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
Models, Statistical, Fourier Analysis, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted: methods, Normal Distribution, Brain, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Healthy Volunteers, Image Enhancement: methods, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Computer Simulation, Brain: diagnostic imaging, Artifacts, Algorithms, Software, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/610, Retrospective Studies
Models, Statistical, Fourier Analysis, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted: methods, Normal Distribution, Brain, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Healthy Volunteers, Image Enhancement: methods, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Computer Simulation, Brain: diagnostic imaging, Artifacts, Algorithms, Software, info:eu-repo/classification/ddc/610, Retrospective Studies
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 5 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
