
doi: 10.1002/mrm.26735
pmid: 28556247
PurposeTo assess the potential of a real‐time field‐control (FC) system for mitigating effects of spatiotemporal field fluctuations in quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) at 7 T.MethodsMagnitude, phase, and QSM images of phantoms and healthy volunteers were acquired under standard conditions and under induced field perturbation (FP) (phantoms: periodic water‐bottle displacement; volunteers: deep breathing and forearm movement) with and without FC, which continuously detects and minimizes magnetic‐field variations.ResultsField control successfully eliminated FP‐induced impairment of phantom image quality and deviations from a linear susceptibility increase for increasing gadolinium concentration in a Gd dilution series (y = 320x – 0.60, R2 = 0.93 for the scan with FP and FC versus y = 259x – 0.54, R2 = 0.78 for the scan with FP and no FC (slope literature value: 326 ppm L/mol)). Similarly, in volunteers, FC allowed a recovery of a FP‐induced loss of identifiable brain structures and reduced the relative change of mean susceptibilities and standard deviations (93 ± 53% to 34 ± 46%) in all regions of interests with respect to the reference scan.ConclusionsReal‐time FC improved the delineation of brain structures and the match of susceptibility values with reference values obtained without FP. Magn Reson Med 79:770–778, 2018. © 2017 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
10042 Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Phantoms, Imaging, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, 2741 Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Brain, Humans, 610 Medicine & health, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Algorithms
10042 Clinic for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Radiology Nuclear Medicine and imaging, Phantoms, Imaging, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, 2741 Radiology, Nuclear Medicine and Imaging, Brain, Humans, 610 Medicine & health, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 13 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
