
doi: 10.1002/mrm.26289
pmid: 27297682
PurposeTo propose the technique multiband echo‐shifted (MESH) echo planar imaging (EPI), which combines the principles of echo‐shifted acquisition for two‐dimensional multislice EPI, with both in‐plane and multiband acceleration by means of partial parallel imaging techniques.MethodsMESH EPI is suitable for functional MRI (fMRI) in situations where there is sufficient time to insert an additional EPI readout in the dead time between slice selection and the standard EPI readout. In such situations, MESH EPI can further accelerate data acquisition compared with standard multiband techniques. The method is particularly well suited for low static magnetic field strengths and lower spatial resolutions. We compared MESH with multiband and standard EPI with temporal signal‐to‐noise ratio (tSNR) measurements and resting state fMRI data.ResultsResults obtained at 1.5 T from healthy subjects revealed that the additional gradient switching did not additionally affect time course SNR over and above the reduction inherent to multiband imaging. Functional results were qualitatively similar between methods. MESH was not affected by the tSNR reduction and echo shifting gradients. The MESH data were acquired at a factor 2 or 3 faster than corresponding multiband acquisitions for echo shift factors of 1 and 2, respectively.ConclusionMESH can offer further acceleration of image acquisition for fMRI at no loss in sensitivity. Magn Reson Med 77:1981–1986, 2017. © 2016 International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine
Echo-Planar Imaging, 2023 OA procedure, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Brain, Humans, Signal-To-Noise Ratio, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 150 000 MR Techniques in Brain Function, Healthy Volunteers
Echo-Planar Imaging, 2023 OA procedure, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Brain, Humans, Signal-To-Noise Ratio, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 150 000 MR Techniques in Brain Function, Healthy Volunteers
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 10 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
