
PurposeTo estimate k‐space trajectory errors in non‐Cartesian acquisitions and reconstruct distortion‐free images, without trajectory measurements or gradient calibrations.Theory and MethodsThe Trajectory Auto‐Corrected image Reconstruction method jointly estimates k‐space trajectory errors and images, based on SENSE and SPIRiT parallel imaging reconstruction. The underlying idea is that parallel imaging and oversampling in the center of k‐space provides data redundancy that can be exploited to simultaneously reconstruct images and correct trajectory errors. Trajectory errors are represented as weighted sums of trajectory‐dependent error basis functions, the coefficients of which are estimated using gradient‐based optimization.ResultsTrajectory Auto‐Corrected image Reconstruction was applied to reconstruct images and errors in golden angle radial, center‐out radial, and spiral in vivo 7 Tesla brain acquisitions in five subjects. Compared to reconstructions using nominal trajectories, Trajectory auto‐corrected image reconstructions contained considerably less blurring and streaking and were of similar quality to images reconstructed using measured k‐space trajectories in the center‐out radial and spiral cases. Reconstruction cost function reductions and improvements in normalized image gradient squared were also similar to those for images reconstructed using measured trajectories.ConclusionTrajectory Auto‐Corrected image Reconstruction enables non‐Cartesian image reconstructions free from trajectory errors without the need for separate gradient calibrations or trajectory measurements. Magn Reson Med 76:757–768, 2016. © 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Brain, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Artifacts, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Algorithms, Pattern Recognition, Automated
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Brain, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Artifacts, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Algorithms, Pattern Recognition, Automated
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 18 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
