
doi: 10.1002/mrm.24743
pmid: 23589312
AbstractPurposeResults from several recent studies suggest the magnetic resonance diffusion‐derived metric mean kurtosis (MK) to be a sensitive marker for tissue pathology; however, lengthy acquisition and postprocessing time hamper further exploration. The purpose of this study is to introduce and evaluate a new MK metric and a rapid protocol for its estimation.MethodsThe protocol requires acquisition of 13 standard diffusion‐weighted images, followed by linear combination of log diffusion signals, thus avoiding nonlinear optimization. The method was evaluated on an ex vivo rat brain and an in vivo human brain. Parameter maps were compared with MK estimated from a standard diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) data set comprising 160 diffusion‐weighted images.ResultsThe new MK displays remarkably similar contrast to MK, and the proposed protocol acquires the necessary data in less than 1 min for full human brain coverage, with a postprocessing time of a few seconds. Scan–rescan reproducibility was comparable with MK.ConclusionThe framework offers a robust and rapid method for estimating MK, with a protocol easily adapted on commercial scanners, as it requires only minimal modification of standard diffusion‐weighting protocols. These properties make the method feasible in practically any clinical setting.
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Brain, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Algorithms
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Brain, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 113 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
