
doi: 10.1002/mrm.24738
pmid: 23554094
PurposeThe goal of this work is to increase the spatial resolution of training data, used by reconstruction methods such as k–t SENSE in order to calculate the missing data in a series of dynamic images, without compromising their temporal resolution or acquisition time.TheoryThe k‐t SENSE method allows dynamic imaging at high acceleration factors with high reconstruction quality. However, the low resolution training data required by k‐t SENSE may cause undesired temporal filtering effects in the reconstructed images.MethodsIn this work, a feedback regularization approach is applied to realize auto‐calibration of the k‐t SENSE algorithm. To that end, a full resolution training data set is calculated from the accelerated data itself using a TSENSE reconstruction. The reconstructed training data are then fed back for the actual k‐t SENSE reconstruction. For evaluation of our approach, temporal filtering effects are quantified by calculating the modulation transfer function and noise measurements are done by Monte‐Carlo simulations.ResultsComputer simulations and cardiac imaging experiments demonstrate an improved temporal fidelity of auto‐calibrated k‐t SENSE compared to standard k‐t SENSE.ConclusionAuto‐calibrated k‐t SENSE provides high quality reconstructions for dynamic imaging applications. Magn Reson Med 71:1123–1129, 2014. © 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Internationality, Calibration, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine, Reproducibility of Results, Image Enhancement, Sensitivity and Specificity, Algorithms
Internationality, Calibration, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine, Reproducibility of Results, Image Enhancement, Sensitivity and Specificity, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 6 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
