
doi: 10.1002/mrm.23188
pmid: 21994010
AbstractParallel magnetic resonance imaging in k‐space such as generalized auto‐calibrating partially parallel acquisition exploits spatial correlation among neighboring signals over multiple coils in calibration to estimate missing signals in reconstruction. It is often challenging to achieve accurate calibration information due to data corruption with noises and spatially varying correlation. The purpose of this work is to address these problems simultaneously by developing a new, adaptive iterative generalized auto‐calibrating partially parallel acquisition with dynamic self‐calibration. With increasing iterations, under a framework of the Kalman filter spatial correlation is estimated dynamically updating calibration signals in a measurement model and using fixed‐point state transition in a process model while missing signals outside the step‐varying calibration region are reconstructed, leading to adaptive self‐calibration and reconstruction. Noise statistic is incorporated in the Kalman filter models, yielding coil‐weighted de‐noising in reconstruction. Numerical and in vivo studies are performed, demonstrating that the proposed method yields highly accurate calibration and thus reduces artifacts and noises even at high acceleration. Magn Reson Med, 2011. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Calibration, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Republic of Korea, Brain, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Algorithms, Feedback
Calibration, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Republic of Korea, Brain, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Algorithms, Feedback
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 11 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Average | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Average |
