
doi: 10.1002/mrm.23047
pmid: 22034242
AbstractBiological tissues frequently contain different water compartments, and these often have distinct transverse relaxation times. Quantification of these may be problematic on clinical scanners because spin echo sequences usually have initial echo times that are too long to accurately quantify shorter relaxation time components. In this study, an ultrashort echo time pulse sequence was used together with bicomponent analysis to quantify both the short and long T2 components in tissues of the musculoskeletal system. Feasibility studies were performed using numerical simulation, and on phantoms and in vitro tissues including bovine cortical bone, ligaments, menisci, tendons, and articular cartilage. The simulation and phantom studies demonstrated that this technique can quantify T2* and fractions of the short and long T2 components. The tissues studies showed two distinct components with short T2*s ranging from 0.3 ms for bovine cortical bone to 2.1 ms for menisci, and long T2*s ranging from 2.9 ms for bovine cortical bone to 35.0 ms for articular cartilage. The short T2* fraction ranged from 18.5% for patella cartilage to 80.9% for ligaments. The results show that ultrashort echo time imaging with bicomponent analysis can quantify the short and long T2 water components in vitro in musculoskeletal tissues. Magn Reson Med, 2012. © 2011 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
Cartilage, Articular, Time Factors, Phantoms, Imaging, Goats, Achilles Tendon, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Bone and Bones, Cadaver, Animals, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Cattle, Computer Simulation, Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Algorithms
Cartilage, Articular, Time Factors, Phantoms, Imaging, Goats, Achilles Tendon, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Bone and Bones, Cadaver, Animals, Feasibility Studies, Humans, Cattle, Computer Simulation, Anterior Cruciate Ligament, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 130 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
