<script type="text/javascript">
<!--
document.write('<div id="oa_widget"></div>');
document.write('<script type="text/javascript" src="https://www.openaire.eu/index.php?option=com_openaire&view=widget&format=raw&projectId=undefined&type=result"></script>');
-->
</script>
doi: 10.1002/mrm.22161
pmid: 19785017
AbstractBoth parallel MRI and compressed sensing (CS) are emerging techniques to accelerate conventional MRI by reducing the number of acquired data. The combination of parallel MRI and CS for further acceleration is of great interest. In this paper, we propose a novel method to combine sensitivity encoding (SENSE), one of the standard methods for parallel MRI, and compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging (SparseMRI), a recently proposed method for applying CS in MR imaging with Cartesian trajectories. The proposed method, named CS‐SENSE, sequentially reconstructs a set of aliased reduced‐field‐of‐view images in each channel using SparseMRI and then reconstructs the final image from the aliased images using Cartesian SENSE. The results from simulations and phantom and in vivo experiments demonstrate that CS‐SENSE can achieve a reduction factor higher than those achieved by SparseMRI and SENSE individually and outperform the existing method that combines parallel MRI and CS. Magn Reson Med, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Phantoms, Imaging, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Brain, Humans, Information Storage and Retrieval, Reproducibility of Results, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Algorithms
Phantoms, Imaging, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Brain, Humans, Information Storage and Retrieval, Reproducibility of Results, Signal Processing, Computer-Assisted, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Algorithms
citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 413 | |
popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |