
AbstractThe application of multivoxel pattern analysis methods has attracted increasing attention, particularly for brain state prediction and real‐time functional MRI applications. Support vector classification is the most popular of these techniques, owing to reports that it has better prediction accuracy and is less sensitive to noise. Support vector classification was applied to learn functional connectivity patterns that distinguish patients with depression from healthy volunteers. In addition, two feature selection algorithms were implemented (one filter method, one wrapper method) that incorporate reliability information into the feature selection process. These reliability feature selections methods were compared to two previously proposed feature selection methods. A support vector classifier was trained that reliably distinguishes healthy volunteers from clinically depressed patients. The reliability feature selection methods outperformed previously utilized methods. The proposed framework for applying support vector classification to functional connectivity data is applicable to other disease states beyond major depression. Magn Reson Med, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Adult, Male, Depressive Disorder, Major, Reproducibility of Results, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Artificial Intelligence, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Female, Algorithms
Adult, Male, Depressive Disorder, Major, Reproducibility of Results, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Pattern Recognition, Automated, Artificial Intelligence, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Female, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 373 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% |
