
doi: 10.1002/mrm.21917
pmid: 19319889
AbstractNovel methodologies have been recently developed to characterize the microgeometry of neural tissues and porous structures via diffusion MRI data. In line with these previous works, this article provides a detailed mathematical description of q‐space in spherical coordinates that helps to highlight the differences and similarities between various related q‐space methodologies proposed to date such as q‐ball imaging (QBI), diffusion spectrum imaging (DSI), and diffusion orientation transform imaging (DOT). This formulation provides a direct relationship between the orientation distribution function (ODF) and the diffusion data without using any approximation. Under this relationship, the exact ODF can be computed by means of the Radon transform of the radial projection (in q‐space) of the diffusion MRI signal. This new methodology, termed exact q‐ball imaging (EQBI), was put into practice using an analytical ODF estimation in terms of spherical harmonics that allows obtaining model‐free and model‐based reconstructions. This work provides a new framework for combining information coming from diffusion data recorded on multiple spherical shells in q‐space (hybrid diffusion imaging encoding scheme), which is capable of mapping ODF to a high accuracy. This represents a step toward a more efficient development of diffusion MRI experiments for obtaining better ODF estimates. Magn Reson Med, 2009. © 2009 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Reproducibility of Results, Computer Simulation, Image Enhancement, Models, Biological, Sensitivity and Specificity, Algorithms
Diffusion Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Reproducibility of Results, Computer Simulation, Image Enhancement, Models, Biological, Sensitivity and Specificity, Algorithms
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 67 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
