
doi: 10.1002/mrm.21435
pmid: 17969027
AbstractA novel approach that uses the concepts of parallel imaging to grid data sampled along a non‐Cartesian trajectory using GRAPPA operator gridding (GROG) is described. GROG shifts any acquired data point to its nearest Cartesian location, thereby converting non‐Cartesian to Cartesian data. Unlike other parallel imaging methods, GROG synthesizes the net weight for a shift in any direction from a single basis set of weights along the logical k‐space directions. Given the vastly reduced size of the basis set, GROG calibration and reconstruction requires fewer operations and less calibration data than other parallel imaging methods for gridding. Instead of calculating and applying a density compensation function (DCF), GROG requires only local averaging, as the reconstructed points fall upon the Cartesian grid. Simulations are performed to demonstrate that the root mean square error (RMSE) values of images gridded with GROG are similar to those for images gridded using the gold‐standard convolution gridding. Finally, GROG is compared to the convolution gridding technique using data sampled along radial, spiral, rosette, and BLADE (a.k.a. periodically rotated overlapping parallel lines with enhanced reconstruction [PROPELLER]) trajectories. Magn Reson Med, 2007. © 2007 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Artificial Intelligence, Phantoms, Imaging, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Brain, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Algorithms, Pattern Recognition, Automated
Artificial Intelligence, Phantoms, Imaging, Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted, Brain, Humans, Reproducibility of Results, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity, Algorithms, Pattern Recognition, Automated
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 108 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
