
pmid: 7500880
AbstractSequential albumin‐Gd‐DTPA and Gd‐DTPA dynamic enhancement studies were performed in an animal tumor model for the comparison of regional vascularity and permeability parameters measured by these two different sizes of contrast agents. The early albumin‐Gd‐DTPA enhancement arises from the vascular compartment, and the averaged signal enhancement derived from the first 3 to first 6 images postinjection can be reliably used to assess vascularity. The signal intensity in the images during the period of 5‐10 min post‐albumin‐Gd‐DTPA injection shows a steady linear variation. The intercept of the linear relationship is another indicator of the vascularity and the slope represents the tumor permeability to albumin‐Gd‐DTPA. The Gd‐DTPA enhancement study was analyzed by a two‐compartmental pharmacokinetic model to calculate the regional vascularity and permeability. The permeability parameters measured from albumin‐Gd‐DTPA and Gd‐DTPA show an excellent correlation. The vascularity parameters measured from albumin‐Gd‐DTPA show good linear correlation with the low vascularity groups measured by Gd‐DTPA, but show saturation for the high vascularity groups. The enhancement mechanisms for both contrast agents are discussed to relate the imaging parameters to the physiological variables.
Gadolinium DTPA, Contrast Media, Pentetic Acid, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Permeability, Rats, Molecular Weight, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Regional Blood Flow, Albumins, Organometallic Compounds, Animals, Blood Vessels, Female, Carcinoma 256, Walker
Gadolinium DTPA, Contrast Media, Pentetic Acid, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Permeability, Rats, Molecular Weight, Rats, Sprague-Dawley, Regional Blood Flow, Albumins, Organometallic Compounds, Animals, Blood Vessels, Female, Carcinoma 256, Walker
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 44 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Average | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
