
pmid: 1461131
AbstractWe have made cross‐sectional image “neurograms” in which peripheral nerve has a greater signal intensity than that of other tissue. Neurographic images of the rabbit forelimb were obtained using a spin‐echo magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) technique that combines fat suppression and diffusion weighting. After fat suppression the nerve shows up in relative isolation and is brighter than the surrounding tissue due to its longer T2 relaxation time of ≈︁ 50 ms compared to ≈︁ 27 ms for muscle. The addition of pulsed gradients for diffusion weighting of the MR signal further enhances the intensity of the nerve signal relative to that of surrounding muscle tissue. The greater diffusional anisotropy of nerve tissue (D∥/D∥ = 3.1) compared to that of muscle (D∥/D∥ = 1.9) allows further enhancement of the nerve by a subtraction of two diffusion‐weighted images, one with the gradients oriented parallel and one with the gradients oriented perpendicular to the nerve orientation. We show that by manipulation of the MRI parameters, either echo time or pulsed gradient strength, the nerves can be made to show up as the most intense feature. This verifies the feasibility of generating three‐dimensional “neurographic” images, analogous to angiograms, but which demonstrate the peripheral nerve tracts in apparent isolation.© 1992 Academic Press,Inc.
Adipose Tissue, Muscles, Subtraction Technique, Forelimb, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Animals, Peripheral Nerves, Rabbits, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Median Nerve
Adipose Tissue, Muscles, Subtraction Technique, Forelimb, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Animals, Peripheral Nerves, Rabbits, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Median Nerve
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 199 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 1% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 1% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
