
doi: 10.1002/mrm.1236
pmid: 11550258
AbstractThe SiMultaneous Acquisition of Spatial Harmonics (SMASH) technique uses linear combinations of undersampled datasets from the component coils of an RF coil array to reconstruct fully sampled composite datasets in reduced imaging times. In previously reported implementations, SMASH reconstructions were designed to reproduce the images that would otherwise be obtained by simple sums of fully gradient encoded component coil images. This strategy has left SMASH images vulnerable to phase cancellation artifacts when the sensitivities of RF coil array elements are not suitably phase‐aligned. In fully gradient encoded imaging schemes these artifacts can be eliminated using a variety of methods for combining the individual coil images, including matched filter combinations as well as sum of squares combinations. Until now, these reconstruction schemes have been unavailable to SMASH reconstructions as SMASH produced a final composite image directly from the raw component coil k‐space datasets. This article demonstrates a modification to SMASH that allows reconstruction of a full set of accelerated individual component coil images by fitting component coil sensitivity functions to a complete set of spatial harmonics tailored for each coil in the array. Standard component coil combinations applied to the individual reconstructed images produce final composite images free of phase cancellation artifacts. Magn Reson Med 46:619–623, 2001. © 2001 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Adult, Phantoms, Imaging, Reference Values, Abdomen, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Equipment Design, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity
Adult, Phantoms, Imaging, Reference Values, Abdomen, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Equipment Design, Image Enhancement, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Sensitivity and Specificity
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 36 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
