
doi: 10.1002/mrm.10388
pmid: 12594752
AbstractThe additional data acquired when using multiple receiver coils is commonly used to improve SNR or reduce acquisition times. It may also be used to remove image artifacts by selectively replacing corrupt data. In the present study, a correction scheme is presented based on simultaneous acquisition of spatial harmonics (SMASH) that enables detection and correction of motion artifacts caused by 2D translations. Newly measured data is compared with predictions from previously measured data by making negative and positive spatial harmonics. Differences are attributed to motion occurring in the interval between the acquisition of separate phase encode lines and correction parameters are determined. Two types of rigid body motion are considered: 1) object and coil array move, and 2) object only moves, since each causes different phase errors in k‐space. Simulation, phantom, and volunteer experiments demonstrate the validity of the technique. Magn Reson Med 49:493–500, 2003. © 2003 Wiley‐Liss, Inc.
Shoulder, Fourier Analysis, Phantoms, Imaging, Movement, 610, Humans, Computer Simulation, Artifacts, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Mathematics, 620
Shoulder, Fourier Analysis, Phantoms, Imaging, Movement, 610, Humans, Computer Simulation, Artifacts, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Mathematics, 620
| citations This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 45 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
