
doi: 10.1002/mp.15684
pmid: 35488299
AbstractPurposeCone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) plays an important role in radiotherapy, but the presence of a large number of artifacts limits its application. The purpose of this study was to use respath‐cycleGAN to synthesize CT (sCT) similar to planning CT (pCT) from CBCT for future clinical practice.MethodsThe method integrates the respath concept into the original cycleGAN, called respath‐cycleGAN, to map CBCT to pCT. Thirty patients were used for training and 15 for testing.ResultsThe mean absolute error (MAE), root mean square error (RMSE), peak signal to noise ratio (PSNR), structural similarity index (SSIM), and spatial nonuniformity (SNU) were calculated to assess the quality of sCT generated from CBCT. Compared with CBCT images, the MAE improved from 197.72 to 140.7, RMSE from 339.17 to 266.51, and PSNR from 22.07 to 24.44, while SSIM increased from 0.948 to 0.964. Both visually and quantitatively, sCT with respath is superior to sCT without respath. We also performed a generalization test of the head‐and‐neck (H&N) model on a pelvic data set. The results again showed that our model was superior.ConclusionWe developed a respath‐cycleGAN method to synthesize CT with good quality from CBCT. In future clinical practice, this method may be used to develop radiotherapy plans.
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Radiotherapy Dosage, Spiral Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Signal-To-Noise Ratio, Artifacts
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Humans, Radiotherapy Dosage, Spiral Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography, Signal-To-Noise Ratio, Artifacts
| selected citations These citations are derived from selected sources. This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | 23 | |
| popularity This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% | |
| influence This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically). | Top 10% | |
| impulse This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network. | Top 10% |
