Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Medical Physicsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Medical Physics
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
Medical Physics
Article . 2021
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Deformable registration of lateral cephalogram and cone‐beam computed tomography image

Authors: Yungeng, Zhang; Haifang, Qin; Peixin, Li; Yuru, Pei; Yuke, Guo; Tianmin, Xu; Hongbin, Zha;

Deformable registration of lateral cephalogram and cone‐beam computed tomography image

Abstract

AbstractPurpose: This study aimed to design and evaluate a novel method for the registration of 2D lateral cephalograms and 3D craniofacial cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) images, providing patient‐specific 3D structures from a 2D lateral cephalogram without additional radiation exposure.Methods: We developed a cross‐modal deformable registration model based on a deep convolutional neural network. Our approach took advantage of a low‐dimensional deformation field encoding and an iterative feedback scheme to infer coarse‐to‐fine volumetric deformations. In particular, we constructed a statistical subspace of deformation fields and parameterized the nonlinear mapping function from an image pair, consisting of the target 2D lateral cephalogram and the reference volumetric CBCT, to a latent encoding of the deformation field. Instead of the one‐shot registration by the learned mapping function, a feedback scheme was introduced to progressively update the reference volumetric image and to infer coarse‐to‐fine deformations fields, accounting for the shape variations of anatomical structures. A total of 220 clinically obtained CBCTs were used to train and validate the proposed model, among which 120 CBCTs were used to generate a training dataset with 24k paired synthetic lateral cephalograms and CBCTs. The proposed approach was evaluated on the deformable 2D–3D registration of clinically obtained lateral cephalograms and CBCTs from growing and adult orthodontic patients.Results: Strong structural consistencies were observed between the deformed CBCT and the target lateral cephalogram in all criteria. The proposed method achieved state‐of‐the‐art performances with the mean contour deviation of 0.410.12 mm on the anterior cranial base, 0.480.17 mm on the mandible, and 0.350.08 mm on the maxilla, respectively. The mean surface mesh ranged from 0.78 to 0.97 mm on various craniofacial structures, and the LREs ranged from 0.83 to 1.24 mm on the growing datasets regarding 14 landmarks. The proposed iterative feedback scheme handled the structural details and improved the registration. The resultant deformed volumetric image was consistent with the target lateral cephalogram in both 2D projective planes and 3D volumetric space regarding the multicategory craniofacial structures.Conclusions: The results suggest that the deep learning‐based 2D–3D registration model enables the deformable alignment of 2D lateral cephalograms and CBCTs and estimates patient‐specific 3D craniofacial structures.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Adult, Imaging, Three-Dimensional, Image Processing, Computer-Assisted, Maxilla, Humans, Mandible, Neural Networks, Computer, Cone-Beam Computed Tomography

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    6
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
6
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!