Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Medical Physicsarrow_drop_down
image/svg+xml Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao Closed Access logo, derived from PLoS Open Access logo. This version with transparent background. http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Closed_Access_logo_transparent.svg Jakob Voss, based on art designer at PLoS, modified by Wikipedia users Nina and Beao
Medical Physics
Article . 2021 . Peer-reviewed
License: Wiley Online Library User Agreement
Data sources: Crossref
Medical Physics
Article . 2021
versions View all 2 versions
addClaim

Technical Note: Performance evaluation of a small‐animal PET/CT system based on NEMA NU 4–2008 standards

Authors: Qiong, Liu; Chaofan, Li; Jiguo, Liu; Kishore, Krish; Xinlei, Fu; Jie, Zhao; Jyh-Cheng, Chen;

Technical Note: Performance evaluation of a small‐animal PET/CT system based on NEMA NU 4–2008 standards

Abstract

AbstractPurposeThe MetisTM PET/CT is a self‐developed, silicon photomultiplier (SiPM) detector‐based, rodent PET/CT system. The objective of this study was to evaluate the performance of the system using the National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) NU 4–2008 standard protocol.MethodsEnergy resolution, spatial resolution, sensitivity, scatter fraction (SF), noise‐equivalent count rate (NECR), and image quality (IQ) characteristics were measured. A micro Derenzo phantom experiment was performed to evaluate the spatial resolution using three‐dimensional ordered‐subsets expectation maximization (3D‐OSEM) and maximum likelihood expectation maximization (MLEM) reconstructed images. In addition, the CT imaging agent Ioverol 350 was mixed with fluorine‐18 (18F)‐fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) and then injected into the micro Derenzo phantom to evaluate the PET/CT imaging. In vivo PET/CT imaging studies were also conducted in a healthy mouse and rat using 18F‐FDG.ResultsThe mean energy resolution of the system was 15.3%. The tangential resolution was 0.82 mm full‐width half‐maximum (FWHM) at the center of the field of the view (FOV), and the radial and axial resolution were generally lower than 2.0 mm FWHM. The spatial resolution was significantly improved when using 3D‐OSEM, especially the axial FWHM could be improved by up to about 57%. The system absolute sensitivity was 7.7% and 6.8% for an energy window of 200–750 and 350–750 keV respectively. The scatter fraction was 8.2% and 12.1% for the mouse‐ and rat‐like phantom respectively. The peak NECR was 1343.72 kcps at 69 MBq and 640.32 kcps at 53 MBq for the mouse‐ and rat‐like phantom respectively. The 1‐mm fillable rod in the IQ phantom can be clearly observed. We can identify the 0.6‐mm aperture of the micro Derenzo phantom image clearly using 3D‐OSEM (10 subsets, 5 iterations). We also performed the fusion of the PET and CT images of the mouse and the brain imaging of the rat.ConclusionsThe results show that the system has the characteristics of high‐resolution, high‐sensitivity, and excellent IQ and is suitable for rodent imaging‐based research.

Related Organizations
Keywords

Mice, Fluorodeoxyglucose F18, Phantoms, Imaging, Positron Emission Tomography Computed Tomography, Positron-Emission Tomography, Animals, Reference Standards, Rats

  • BIP!
    Impact byBIP!
    selected citations
    These citations are derived from selected sources.
    This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    11
    popularity
    This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
    influence
    This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
    Average
    impulse
    This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
    Top 10%
Powered by OpenAIRE graph
Found an issue? Give us feedback
selected citations
These citations are derived from selected sources.
This is an alternative to the "Influence" indicator, which also reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Citations provided by BIP!
popularity
This indicator reflects the "current" impact/attention (the "hype") of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Popularity provided by BIP!
influence
This indicator reflects the overall/total impact of an article in the research community at large, based on the underlying citation network (diachronically).
BIP!Influence provided by BIP!
impulse
This indicator reflects the initial momentum of an article directly after its publication, based on the underlying citation network.
BIP!Impulse provided by BIP!
11
Top 10%
Average
Top 10%
Upload OA version
Are you the author of this publication? Upload your Open Access version to Zenodo!
It’s fast and easy, just two clicks!